Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com
Offthepost (Generation II) Forum Index Offthepost (Generation II)
ATTENTION: OFFTHEPOST.NET NO LONGER EXISTS AS A URL. The old site had to be closed. Please reset your bookmarks!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Forbes' most valuable team$

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Offthepost (Generation II) Forum Index -> Hockey Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
E.L.3000
Big in Japan


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: MTL Police: stay out ma bizness

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:13 am    Post subject: Forbes' most valuable team$ Reply with quote

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2007/11/08/leafs_value/

Forbes' franchise value list is back yet again, and the league made 96 million bucks last year. Most of the teams increased in value.

1. Leafs 413M
2. Rags 365M
3. Wings 293M
4. Habs 283M

...

(Tie) 30. Saskatoon Beer League Senior Men's Team 143M
(Tie) 30. Crashville 143M (a full 100M less than Jim Balsillie was willing to pay, mind you)
_________________
John McCain is fit as a fiddle… Is 71 the new 30?” - Fox News' Rich Lowry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DH
Lloyd's Minster


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 362
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jesus. If the average value is approx $180M then the value of 30 teams is $5.4B.

$96M / $5.4B = 1.8% return on assets. That's a shitty investment at best.

I think these franchise "values" are grossly overinflated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3205
Location: Sweetest lid in the league

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DH wrote:

$96M / $5.4B = 1.8% return on assets. That's a shitty investment at best.


With the exception of the Leafs and a couple of different franchises over the past 10 years, yearly profits are not how the teams count on making money. Franchise fees are coins in the owners pockets and the increase in value of franchises over the past 20 years is what they count on.

Quote:
I think these franchise "values" are grossly overinflated.


You can thank Ballsillie for that.
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Stinky
Woman of Color of the Post


Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 860

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Leafs are worth almost 50 mil more than the rags?

I'll tell my wife her pension is looking good... Wink
_________________
The crowd once again showed its IQ level when it shouted ``U-S-A, U-S-A,'' during the fight. Their hero, Downie, is from Newmarket, Ont.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DH
Lloyd's Minster


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 362
Location: Alberta

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bosc Ulrich II wrote:
DH wrote:

$96M / $5.4B = 1.8% return on assets. That's a shitty investment at best.


Franchise fees are coins in the owners pockets and the increase in value of franchises over the past 20 years is what they count on.



Franchise fees are almost negligible given how infrequently it occurs, and it probably doesn't even add a decimal point to the return on the investment once it's spread amongst 30 teams.

Counting on an increase in value without an increase in the underlying cash flow is nothing more than the game of greater fools. ie. hope someone is dumb enough to pay more than you paid. These games go on until the bubble bursts. History is full of examples.

My bottom line is that buying an NHL franchise today would be a horrible investment choice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Stinky
Woman of Color of the Post


Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 860

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DH wrote:


My bottom line is that buying an NHL franchise today would be a horrible investment choice.
I think for most who own sports teams, they really aren't that worried about that particular investment...
_________________
The crowd once again showed its IQ level when it shouted ``U-S-A, U-S-A,'' during the fight. Their hero, Downie, is from Newmarket, Ont.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3205
Location: Sweetest lid in the league

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DH wrote:
Franchise fees are almost negligible given how infrequently it occurs, and it probably doesn't even add a decimal point to the return on the investment once it's spread amongst 30 teams.


Yeah, it's not a factor anymore now that expansion hasn't occurred for a while

Quote:
Counting on an increase in value without an increase in the underlying cash flow is nothing more than the game of greater fools. ie. hope someone is dumb enough to pay more than you paid. These games go on until the bubble bursts. History is full of examples.

My bottom line is that buying an NHL franchise today would be a horrible investment choice.


You're right on both counts. But the franchise value increase is still how many owners counted on making dough(and like you said, many are fools in how they run their team, the leader they've chosen, etc..).

The NHL is not a normal business. Buying into a franchise to expect a high return on assets is definitely horrible investment choice and everyone knows it.
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Lillith
Forum Witch


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 420
Location: Second Star to the Right

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can someone please explain to me how Toronto got to the top if the list?
_________________
No one can make you feel inferior without your permission.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Captain Chaos
(Formerly Lieutenant Chaos)


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 411
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lillith wrote:
Can someone please explain to me how Toronto got to the top if the list?


With better business skills than hockey skills.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hounsy
Reigning King of One-Liners


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 1215

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Captain Chaos wrote:
Lillith wrote:
Can someone please explain to me how Toronto got to the top if the list?


With better business skills than hockey skills.


Luck of the draw in having the biggest Hockey market helps.
_________________
It's not you Sundin, it's me...please just leave...and don't look back....please please do not look back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3205
Location: Sweetest lid in the league

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lillith wrote:
Can someone please explain to me how Toronto got to the top if the list?


They sell out no matter how badly they do, they can charge whatever the hell they want for tickets, and they make the most money. And like Hounsy said, having the biggest hocket market helps.
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
E.L.3000
Big in Japan


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: MTL Police: stay out ma bizness

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bosc Ulrich II wrote:
Lillith wrote:
Can someone please explain to me how Toronto got to the top if the list?


They sell out no matter how badly they do, they can charge whatever the hell they want for tickets, and they make the most money. And like Hounsy said, having the biggest hocket market helps.


That and the Leafs TV cable network is a cash cow. If you want to delve deeper, having complete ownership of the Raptors, which is also a successful franchise, helps a lot.

The Habs have a monstrously good cable deal, and the Bell Centre is the most frequented arena in North America. (it's so busy the UFC couldn't even schedule a fight here). In a couple of years we'll need another arena just to fit in all the events. BTW, George Gillet owns the entertainment group that books all these events (GEG), and that's likely a more profitable venture than the Habs.
_________________
John McCain is fit as a fiddle… Is 71 the new 30?” - Fox News' Rich Lowry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3205
Location: Sweetest lid in the league

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

E.L. wrote:

The Habs have a monstrously good cable deal, and the Bell Centre is the most frequented arena in North America. (it's so busy the UFC couldn't even schedule a fight here). In a couple of years we'll need another arena just to fit in all the events. BTW, George Gillet owns the entertainment group that books all these events (GEG), and that's likely a more profitable venture than the Habs.


Don't the Habs have by far the worst rent/lease deal in the NHL? Or was that in the old barn?
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
E.L.3000
Big in Japan


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1550
Location: MTL Police: stay out ma bizness

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bosc Ulrich II wrote:
Don't the Habs have by far the worst rent/lease deal in the NHL? Or was that in the old barn?


They pay about 25M a year in rent. It's bad when you consider nearly everyone else pays 0, but it's pretty negligiable when the team/arena/TV deal combo is worth over 400M (if Gillett were ever to sell the package).

A far cry when he paid 185 US for the team, and needed a no-interest loan from la caisse pop to do it.
_________________
John McCain is fit as a fiddle… Is 71 the new 30?” - Fox News' Rich Lowry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lillith
Forum Witch


Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 420
Location: Second Star to the Right

PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="E.L."]
Bosc Ulrich II wrote:
Lillith wrote:
Can someone please explain to me how Toronto got to the top if the list?


They sell out no matter how badly they do, they can charge whatever the hell they want for tickets, and they make the most money. And like Hounsy said, having the biggest hocket market helps.
That and the Leafs TV cable network is a cash cow. If you want to delve deeper, having complete ownership of the Raptors, which is also a successful franchise, helps a lot.


OK, I get it. I can also see why most of you would like to see an expansion team in Southern Onterio. I (little me..moi) can buy not so bad tickets to a Red Wings game this year. Actually, I'm waiting for RW to invite me to a game when his partner in crime is out of town!
_________________
No one can make you feel inferior without your permission.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Offthepost (Generation II) Forum Index -> Hockey Talk All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum