 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
saskhab
'03-'04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 3841
Location: Saskatoon!
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:55 am Post subject: Team Size |
 |
|
http://mirtle.blogspot.com/2007/10/size-matters.html
Washington has the biggest team in the NHL, followed closely by Tampa Bay, Toronto, San Jose and Calgary. Atlanta has the samllest team, but the teams around them aren't too shabby... they include Detroit and Carolina. And here I thought Carolina had some big boys, but I guess it's more down the middle that they do.
When you factor in weight, and average the rankings based on that, Detroit is the smallest team in the NHL.
_________________
"Oh my God. There she is. Lovely Sally Slater. I should speak to her. But what the hell can I say? Anything that doesn't mention that I masturbate over her memory is probably a good idea."
- Mark Corrigan, Peep Show |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US679 Part Deux
An improvement over the US678 prototype
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Location: Milton, Ontario
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Habs are still one of the smallest teams in the NHL.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hounsy
Reigning King of One-Liners
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 1488
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| My thirty five and over beer league team could crush them all in the weight stat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
saskhab
'03-'04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 3841
Location: Saskatoon!
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| Habs are still one of the smallest teams in the NHL. |
Well, we have 3 centers under 6' tall, so this is hardly surprising. 
But we have outhit opponents in 5 of our 8 games so far, and 1 was a tie.
_________________
"Oh my God. There she is. Lovely Sally Slater. I should speak to her. But what the hell can I say? Anything that doesn't mention that I masturbate over her memory is probably a good idea."
- Mark Corrigan, Peep Show |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinky
Woman of Color of the Post
Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hounsy wrote: |
| My thirty five and over beer league team could crush them all in the weight stat. |
_________________
www.jimdalling.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Av-merican
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 2322
Location: Denver
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Colorado is still that terribly undersized? I thought we'd be in the upper half by now. Well guess we just gotta hope Nigel Williams and Chris Stewart make the NHL next season... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3477
Location: Sweetest lid in the league
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:36 am Post subject: Re: Team Size |
|
|
| saskhab wrote: |
http://mirtle.blogspot.com/2007/10/size-matters.html
Washington has the biggest team in the NHL, followed closely by Tampa Bay, Toronto, San Jose and Calgary. Atlanta has the samllest team, but the teams around them aren't too shabby... they include Detroit and Carolina. And here I thought Carolina had some big boys, but I guess it's more down the middle that they do.
When you factor in weight, and average the rankings based on that, Detroit is the smallest team in the NHL. |
The weight thing is Hasek's fault.
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US679 Part Deux
An improvement over the US678 prototype
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Location: Milton, Ontario
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| saskhab wrote: |
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| Habs are still one of the smallest teams in the NHL. |
Well, we have 3 centers under 6' tall, so this is hardly surprising.
But we have outhit opponents in 5 of our 8 games so far, and 1 was a tie. |
Oh, I know why, but on a positive they seem to be playing a little bit bigger this year.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
saskhab
'03-'04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 3841
Location: Saskatoon!
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| saskhab wrote: |
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| Habs are still one of the smallest teams in the NHL. |
Well, we have 3 centers under 6' tall, so this is hardly surprising.
But we have outhit opponents in 5 of our 8 games so far, and 1 was a tie. |
Oh, I know why, but on a positive they seem to be playing a little bit bigger this year. |
I wonder how much bigger we'd be on the list if O'Byrne replaced Bouillon on the blueline.
_________________
"Oh my God. There she is. Lovely Sally Slater. I should speak to her. But what the hell can I say? Anything that doesn't mention that I masturbate over her memory is probably a good idea."
- Mark Corrigan, Peep Show |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US679 Part Deux
An improvement over the US678 prototype
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Location: Milton, Ontario
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| saskhab wrote: |
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| saskhab wrote: |
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| Habs are still one of the smallest teams in the NHL. |
Well, we have 3 centers under 6' tall, so this is hardly surprising.
But we have outhit opponents in 5 of our 8 games so far, and 1 was a tie. |
Oh, I know why, but on a positive they seem to be playing a little bit bigger this year. |
I wonder how much bigger we'd be on the list if O'Byrne replaced Bouillon on the blueline. |
I'm sure that alone would take us up 6 spots.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lillith
Forum Witch
Joined: 20 Oct 2007
Posts: 434
Location: Second Star to the Right
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I saw the topic title I got all excited....now I find that yer all talking about height and weight...no fun for this girl.
_________________
No one can make you feel inferior without your permission. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinky
Woman of Color of the Post
Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| saskhab wrote: |
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| saskhab wrote: |
| US679 Part Deux wrote: |
| Habs are still one of the smallest teams in the NHL. |
Well, we have 3 centers under 6' tall, so this is hardly surprising.
But we have outhit opponents in 5 of our 8 games so far, and 1 was a tie. |
Oh, I know why, but on a positive they seem to be playing a little bit bigger this year. |
I wonder how much bigger we'd be on the list if O'Byrne replaced Bouillon on the blueline. |
I'm sure that alone would take us up 6 spots. |
Even last year the notion of the habs being undersized was one of the great NHL myths. they are currently very middle of the road in the size catigory, just as they were last year.
_________________
www.jimdalling.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
monsieur parafect
OTPoliceman
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 123
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Canucks are the lightest team at 199.5 lb, about 5 lb lighter than the league average. I can tell you they are even smaller than that because there is no way Morrison is 5'11" 185 lb. I doubt Cooke is 205 lb either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinky
Woman of Color of the Post
Joined: 19 Oct 2007
Posts: 947
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| monsieur parafect wrote: |
| The Canucks are the lightest team at 199.5 lb, about 5 lb lighter than the league average. I can tell you they are even smaller than that because there is no way Morrison is 5'11" 185 lb. I doubt Cooke is 205 lb either. |
I'm sure you could kick either of their asses
or at least give them a heavy duty wedgie...
with some fuckin' numb chunks!
_________________
www.jimdalling.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
