 |
 |
Offthepost (Generation II) ATTENTION: OFFTHEPOST.NET NO LONGER EXISTS AS A URL. The old site had to be closed. Please reset your bookmarks!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bosc Ulrich II OTP Resident Historian

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2501 Location: Your own blue line!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Jyrki21 Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1393 Location: Ottawa, ON  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:33 pm Post subject: Re: Ken Campbell's GM rankings |
|
|
| Bosc Ulrich II wrote: |
| Razzyboy won't be pleased with who's on top. |
There was a 29/30 chance that that'd be true, regardless.
I think Burke is one of the best, but his stubbornness and refusal to address the goaltending dilemma in Vancouver, to me, means he probably can't be the best. I thyink he's done an excellent job in Anaheim, but I can't argue with Razz that a lot of it fell into his lap, too.
As for this comment about Nonis:
| Quote: |
| Not getting Brad Richards at the deadline was bad enough, but not getting him because Nonis was unwilling to part with Ryan Kesler and Alex Edler borders on inexcusable. |
Do they still not get the Tampa-wanted-a-goalie thing? (Not that I would necessarily give up that package for Richard$ anyway). _________________

Last edited by Jyrki21 on Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bosc Ulrich II OTP Resident Historian

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2501 Location: Your own blue line!  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: Re: Ken Campbell's GM rankings |
|
|
| Jyrki21 wrote: |
I think Burke is one of the best, but his stubbornness and refusal to address the goaltending dilemma in Vancouver, to me, means he probably can't be the best. I thyink he's done an excellent job in Anaheim, but I can't argue with Razz that a lot of it fell into his lap, too.
|
He's certainly done on excellent job in turning around Vancouver and Anaheim financially and (related) in attendance. _________________ Bring back the old OTP!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Av-merican Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1458 Location: Denver  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Much as I too despise Burkey it's hard to argue these rankings. IMO they're pretty much spot-on at first read. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
saskhab Morally Bankrupt Scum

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2515 Location: Saskatoon!  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: Re: Ken Campbell's GM rankings |
|
|
| Jyrki21 wrote: |
| Do they still not get the Dallas-wanted-a-goalie thing? (Not that I would necessarily give up that package for Richard$ anyway). |
They obviously don't factor the incompetence of Feaster into the equation enough, either. Though they did rank Feaster 30th, and very deservedly so. Feaster's demands were incredibly illogical... and it's just fitting, sad and hilarious all at the same that Tortorella hasn't taken to Smith, either. It's like all of Feaster's problems wrapped up in one acquisition. That trade was more about Tampa's incompetence than Dallas' genius, or Vancouver or Columbus' tenativeness. _________________ It's backwards time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bosc Ulrich II OTP Resident Historian

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2501 Location: Your own blue line!  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:07 pm Post subject: Re: Ken Campbell's GM rankings |
|
|
| saskhab wrote: |
| Jyrki21 wrote: |
| Do they still not get the Dallas-wanted-a-goalie thing? (Not that I would necessarily give up that package for Richard$ anyway). |
They obviously don't factor the incompetence of Feaster into the equation enough, either. Though they did rank Feaster 30th, and very deservedly so. Feaster's demands were incredibly illogical... and it's just fitting, sad and hilarious all at the same that Tortorella hasn't taken to Smith, either. It's like all of Feaster's problems wrapped up in one acquisition. That trade was more about Tampa's incompetence than Dallas' genius, or Vancouver or Columbus' tenativeness. |
I haven't heard anything about Smith and Tortorella...what's the story there?
Feaster was looking pretty good before the lockout. His bad drafting record is getting exposed though, as is their scouting and inability to deal with the budget imposed by ownership... _________________ Bring back the old OTP!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Av-merican Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1458 Location: Denver  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rick Dudley deserves some blame for that mess. He screwed up drafting for both Florida franchises. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Jyrki21 Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1393 Location: Ottawa, ON  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oops, I obviously meant that Tampa wanted a goalie, not Dallas, but, well, you all got that. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
razzmatazz Go Habs Go! Vive le CH!

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1285 Location: Burnaby, B.C.  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Burke is a master opportunist, nothing more. He's incompetent in many respects; drafting being the main one. Look at the useless crap Vancouver calls their "prospects"; that's Burke's fault, not Nonis'.
Keenan brought in Bertuzzi. Keenan didn't have the benefit of Pavel Bure due to a holdout. Quinn brought in Naslund. Quinn drafted Ohlund. Burke rode the developing horses he was handed on a silver platter, and SURPRISE - people started coming and spending money when those studs developed...
All he did was let the franchise rot in the goalie cesspool that was Dan Cloutier...
There's a certain parallel with the situation in Anaheim.
Burke is an idiotic blowhard, nothing more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
razzmatazz Go Habs Go! Vive le CH!

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1285 Location: Burnaby, B.C.  |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:21 pm Post subject: Re: Ken Campbell's GM rankings |
|
|
| Jyrki21 wrote: |
| Bosc Ulrich II wrote: |
| Razzyboy won't be pleased with who's on top. |
There was a 29/30 chance that that'd be true, regardless.
I think Burke is one of the best, but his stubbornness and refusal to address the goaltending dilemma in Vancouver, to me, means he probably can't be the best. I thyink he's done an excellent job in Anaheim, but I can't argue with Razz that a lot of it fell into his lap, too.
As for this comment about Nonis:
| Quote: |
| Not getting Brad Richards at the deadline was bad enough, but not getting him because Nonis was unwilling to part with Ryan Kesler and Alex Edler borders on inexcusable. |
Do they still not get the Tampa-wanted-a-goalie thing? (Not that I would necessarily give up that package for Richard$ anyway). |
I agree in part Jyrki, but on the other hand Corey Schnieder has infinitely more value to the Canucks as a trade part than as a warm body... And I still think Canuck fans overrate Edler, just like they overrated Bieksa last year... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tuzer No longer Croozing

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 687
 |
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 9:18 pm Post subject: Re: Ken Campbell's GM rankings |
|
|
| razzmatazz wrote: |
| Jyrki21 wrote: |
| Bosc Ulrich II wrote: |
| Razzyboy won't be pleased with who's on top. |
There was a 29/30 chance that that'd be true, regardless.
I think Burke is one of the best, but his stubbornness and refusal to address the goaltending dilemma in Vancouver, to me, means he probably can't be the best. I thyink he's done an excellent job in Anaheim, but I can't argue with Razz that a lot of it fell into his lap, too.
As for this comment about Nonis:
| Quote: |
| Not getting Brad Richards at the deadline was bad enough, but not getting him because Nonis was unwilling to part with Ryan Kesler and Alex Edler borders on inexcusable. |
Do they still not get the Tampa-wanted-a-goalie thing? (Not that I would necessarily give up that package for Richard$ anyway). |
I agree in part Jyrki, but on the other hand Corey Schnieder has infinitely more value to the Canucks as a trade part than as a warm body... And I still think Canuck fans overrate Edler, just like they overrated Bieksa last year... |
Or just like Bruins fans overrate Wideman for that matter or Stuart  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
razzmatazz Go Habs Go! Vive le CH!

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1285 Location: Burnaby, B.C.  |
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Wideman is criminally underrated... 11 goals my friend, on a team that stresses DDDDDDDFENCE first... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
saskhab Morally Bankrupt Scum

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2515 Location: Saskatoon!  |
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| razzmatazz wrote: |
| Wideman is criminally underrated... 11 goals my friend, on a team that stresses DDDDDDDFENCE first... |
Hey, for once you're underrating him. He's got 12 goals.
8 are PP goals, so that doesn't mean he's a weirdo or something on Julien's "no offence is the best defence" philosophy, but hey, it's a good year. _________________ It's backwards time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
freakydave Less freaky once you get to know him
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 156 Location: Rollin down the street  |
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| razzmatazz wrote: |
| Wideman is criminally underrated... 11 goals my friend, on a team that stresses DDDDDDDFENCE first... |
Wideman
13g 23a 36 pts
BXA 06/07
11g 29a 40 pts on a team that played defence first.
Furthermore boston scored 212 goals while giving up 222
Vancouver scored 213 goals while giving 215
Enjoy being swept by the evil HABS your team earned it. _________________ Mark my words Nonis is a mediocre GM-
I called for his head 07/08
fired apr 14th/08
AV your next |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
 |