 |
 |
Offthepost (Generation II) ATTENTION: OFFTHEPOST.NET NO LONGER EXISTS AS A URL. The old site had to be closed. Please reset your bookmarks!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Av-merican Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1458 Location: Denver  |
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 2:37 pm Post subject: OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD: Girls Gagner Wild |
|
|
PREVIEW
Long story short, things are not good in Av-land, but hey it's not like they're the Maple Leafs or anything.
The good news is despite a power play next to last in the league (thankfully I believe Edmonton has the worst still, expect lots of great PK action in this game ) and an abysmal road record, poor defensive play, and shoddy goaltending, the Avs are still firmly in the Northwest Division title race.
Rumors surrounding a possible trade of impending-UFA John-Michael Liles are running rampant right now. After showing all kinds of promise his first two seasons, Liles has regressed badly since the departure of Rob Blake. He no longer shows the same savvy moving the puck up-ice, and despite a stronger committment to the defensive side of things, has been almost completely ineffective at both ends of the rink. Poor play from Brett Clark and diminishing returns from Scott Hannan aren't helping things. About the only bright spot on the Avs' blueline is Kurt Sauer, who's making a resurgence after two seasons as the Avs' 7th defenseman.
Bottom line, despite the additions of Sauer and Hannan, the defense is dreadfully undersized and soft with Clark, Kyle Cumiskey, and Liles all in the mix. They're all three the exact same kind of defenseman. One has got to go.
Trading/waiving Karlis Skrastins wouldn't be a bad idea either.
Anyhow, Quenneville will be showcasing a line of Hlinka-Stastny-Hejduk in a desperate bid to get the sputtering offense back on track. Stastny has shown he can finish as well as make plays, so the addition of Hlinka, who has also shown solid chemistry with Hejduk as well, should make for a good line and hopefully make for better offensive balance overall.
In any event, JUST FRICKING WIN ALREADY... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
skinnem Poster Girl for OTP

Joined: 19 Oct 2007 Posts: 172 Location: Toronto  |
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I love your thread titles!
You're hilarious! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
shoe
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 35 Location: Base of Pikes Peak  |
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think Liles has got to go. As you said, he started out good but has gone downhill. Maybe a change of scenery would do him good. _________________
Winston Churchill said, "most people occasionally stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up and continue on as if nothing had ever happened". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Av-merican Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1458 Location: Denver  |
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shoe wrote: |
| I think Liles has got to go. As you said, he started out good but has gone downhill. Maybe a change of scenery would do him good. |
I'd rather we get rid of Clark, he was a journeyman anyway who seems to be coming back down to earth after two solid post-lockout seasons. But given the reality that he's signed for two more years and Liles isn't, he seems like the more viable candidate for a trade. Already Flames fans on the HF Boards are clamoring for him.
Anyway I'm still a bit reluctant because I'm still not sold on Cumiskey. He's even smaller than Liles, doesn't skate as well, and frankly is downright scary in the defensive end. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Jyrki21 Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1393 Location: Ottawa, ON  |
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| shoe wrote: |
| I think Liles has got to go. As you said, he started out good but has gone downhill. Maybe a change of scenery would do him good. |
The problem is his pretentious first name.
Jack Liles. Sounds good to me. Maybe "Jack-Mike". _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Av-merican Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1458 Location: Denver  |
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=223906&hubname=
Well, nothin' like getting back in The Can and beating up on the Oilers to rally your spirits. Anaheim will be getting some very nice draft picks soon enough. I'm betting some way, some how both Lowe and MacT find their way to Toronto during the offseason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Bosc Ulrich II OTP Resident Historian

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2501 Location: Your own blue line!  |
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Av-merican wrote: |
http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=223906&hubname=
Well, nothin' like getting back in The Can and beating up on the Oilers to rally your spirits. Anaheim will be getting some very nice draft picks soon enough. I'm betting some way, some how both Lowe and MacT find their way to Toronto during the offseason. |
Not likely. How many years did they just sign Lowe for? 20? _________________ Bring back the old OTP!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Av-merican Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey

Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 1458 Location: Denver  |
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bosc Ulrich II wrote: |
| Not likely. How many years did they just sign Lowe for? 20? |
None of that will matter when Lowe's signing of Penner costs them a lottery pick. Only Peddie would be stupid enough to pick up the tab and bail Edmonton out of paying Lowe's remaning salary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
the New Cunning Linguist Failed Bandwagon Opportunist

Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1244 Location: I'm here, aren't I?  |
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Av-merican wrote: |
| Well, nothin' like getting back in The Can and beating up on the Oilers to rally your spirits. |
Really? What's that like?  _________________ ... Because the old one, is well, old.
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
 |