Free Web Hosting | Free Forum Hosting | Photo Gallery | FreeMarriage.com

Powered by PhpBB.BizHat.com, setup your forum now!
For Support, visit Forums.BizHat.com
Offthepost (Generation II) Forum Index Offthepost (Generation II)
ATTENTION: OFFTHEPOST.NET NO LONGER EXISTS AS A URL. The old site had to be closed. Please reset your bookmarks!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Markus Naslund UFA Watch...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Offthepost (Generation II) Forum Index -> Vancouver Canucks Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
the New Cunning Linguist
Like a good neighbor, but not


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1666
Location: I'm here, aren't I?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:09 pm    Post subject: The Markus Naslund UFA Watch... Reply with quote

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/simpson/2008/03/naslund_will_be_a_catch_on_the.html

Might as well start this now... Do you think DN should re-sign him or let him go to free agency?
_________________
... Because the old one, is well, old.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Jyrki21
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1856
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Everyone seems to want him to move on, but there aren't a ton of Plan B's out there.

I also don't think the captaincy really matters, so I somewhat roll my eyes at those who say "re-sign only if he relinquishes the captaincy!"
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tuzer
No longer Croozing


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 864

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:24 pm    Post subject: Re: The Markus Naslund UFA Watch... Reply with quote

the New Cunning Linguist wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/simpson/2008/03/naslund_will_be_a_catch_on_the.html

Might as well start this now... Do you think DN should re-sign him or let him go to free agency?
As long as we can get him for under 4 million,Than I say re-sign him,Why not??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the New Cunning Linguist
Like a good neighbor, but not


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1666
Location: I'm here, aren't I?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jyrki21 wrote:
Everyone seems to want him to move on, but there aren't a ton of Plan B's out there.

The UFA market doesn't look like it will be well-stocked at all this summer. After you take out the obvious re-signings (Sakic & Sundin) and the one remaining marquee UFA (Hossa) forward, there isn't much left.
_________________
... Because the old one, is well, old.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
HOLLYWOOD35



Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Posts: 103
Location: Langley, BC

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

offer him 4 mill a year and see what happens. does somebody else offer him more. or does he go home. I don't think he's done yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Av-merican
Un-Tenured Professor of Hockey


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 1994
Location: Denver

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If it didn't fall on such a crappy free-agency year I'd say let him walk. That being said the only way you're gonna get a viable scorer to take his place is via trade, and that means either Bourdon or Edler gotta go, not certain anyone's going to give up much for Grabner, whom Nonis seems to have soured on big-time.

Morrison's a UFA though right? I think it's definitely time to let him go. He hasn't been effective for the last 3 years or so and is only getting more brittle.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jyrki21
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1856
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The funny thing is that last summer everyone was looking at 2008 as the "huge UFA crop". It seems people forgot that GMs are aware of this and wish to re-sign the Dany Heatleys of the world. All of a sudden, we're looking at a pretty sorry UFA crop!

I'll give the CBA some credit here which I never expected: its overdose of free agency does make GMs act earlier in terms of re-signing players, thus mitigating the player movement to a pretty significant extent.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the New Cunning Linguist
Like a good neighbor, but not


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1666
Location: I'm here, aren't I?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jyrki21 wrote:
I'll give the CBA some credit here which I never expected: its overdose of free agency does make GMs act earlier in terms of re-signing players, thus mitigating the player movement to a pretty significant extent.

Good observation. That combined with the hyper-inflation of UFAs the last summer has really forced GMs to get this done a lot sooner; if they can sign a known commodity now and perhaps overpay a little, so be it, at least no one else is bidding up the price; the risk of having to paying too much for a quality player when you are bidding against 29 other teams is too high. And it's not just the UFAs but the RFAs are also now considered fair game; they are still overpaying for them, at least from my perspective.

With that in mind, I think DN would be wise to send feelers out to find out what Markus wants to do - stay with the club, test the FA waters, or retire.
_________________
... Because the old one, is well, old.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
saskhab
'03-'04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 3417
Location: Saskatoon!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jyrki21 wrote:
The funny thing is that last summer everyone was looking at 2008 as the "huge UFA crop". It seems people forgot that GMs are aware of this and wish to re-sign the Dany Heatleys of the world. All of a sudden, we're looking at a pretty sorry UFA crop!

I'll give the CBA some credit here which I never expected: its overdose of free agency does make GMs act earlier in terms of re-signing players, thus mitigating the player movement to a pretty significant extent.

You mean makes GM's panic and hand out ridiculously bad contracts that even their successor won't be able to rid themselves of, right?
_________________
"Oh my God. There she is. Lovely Sally Slater. I should speak to her. But what the hell can I say? Anything that doesn't mention that I masturbate over her memory is probably a good idea."

- Mark Corrigan, Peep Show
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Jyrki21
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1856
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saskhab wrote:
You mean makes GM's panic and hand out ridiculously bad contracts that even their successor won't be able to rid themselves of, right?

Essentially, yes. Laughing And I'm cool with that, I like player stability as long as it doesn't hurt the team I cheer for.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tuzer
No longer Croozing


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 864

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Av-merican wrote:

Morrison's a UFA though right? I think it's definitely time to let him go. He hasn't been effective for the last 3 years or so and is only getting more brittle.
19-20 goals a year can hardly be construed as not being effective and not missing a game since 1999 until this year can hardly be called brittle Laughing

I really like Morrison and I believe Nonis would be a fool to let an asset like him get away,He's a BC boy and he wants to play for his hometown club so if we can get him for a reasonable amount I say sign him up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the New Cunning Linguist
Like a good neighbor, but not


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1666
Location: I'm here, aren't I?

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BurrTuzer wrote:
Av-merican wrote:

Morrison's a UFA though right? I think it's definitely time to let him go. He hasn't been effective for the last 3 years or so and is only getting more brittle.
19-20 goals a year can hardly be construed as not being effective and not missing a game since 1999 until this year can hardly be called brittle Laughing

I really like Morrison and I believe Nonis would be a fool to let an asset like him get away,He's a BC boy and he wants to play for his hometown club so if we can get him for a reasonable amount I say sign him up.

Yeah, I agree with Tuzer. He might be overpaid for a 20 goal second line center but I think it was BB who gave him that contract at the height of the WCE.
_________________
... Because the old one, is well, old.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
saskhab
'03-'04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 3417
Location: Saskatoon!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the New Cunning Linguist wrote:
BurrTuzer wrote:
Av-merican wrote:

Morrison's a UFA though right? I think it's definitely time to let him go. He hasn't been effective for the last 3 years or so and is only getting more brittle.
19-20 goals a year can hardly be construed as not being effective and not missing a game since 1999 until this year can hardly be called brittle Laughing

I really like Morrison and I believe Nonis would be a fool to let an asset like him get away,He's a BC boy and he wants to play for his hometown club so if we can get him for a reasonable amount I say sign him up.

Yeah, I agree with Tuzer. He might be overpaid for a 20 goal second line center but I think it was BB who gave him that contract at the height of the WCE.

No, that contract was given to him right after the lockout by Nonis.

I'm doing a curious check of salaries around the NHL right now, finding out who is still getting paid 24% less because they have a pre-lockout contract. There won't be many left after this year... Alfredsson, however, is the guy that lost the most money, but with Yashin's buyout, that's the pre-lockout mistake that effects the team the longest.

The Canucks have no contract that wasn't negotiated under the terms of the current CBA.

Just as an example, Calgary's cap hit has had the benefit of having 3 players on their current roster who still had the 24% paycut factored in (Langkow, Conroy, and Regehr). But all 3 players' contracts expire at the end of this year.

I seriously think that next year, there will only be 5 or so players who are still feeling the 24% hit.
_________________
"Oh my God. There she is. Lovely Sally Slater. I should speak to her. But what the hell can I say? Anything that doesn't mention that I masturbate over her memory is probably a good idea."

- Mark Corrigan, Peep Show
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3222
Location: Sweetest lid in the league

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saskhab wrote:

I'm doing a curious check of salaries around the NHL right now, finding out who is still getting paid 24% less because they have a pre-lockout contract. There won't be many left after this year... Alfredsson, however, is the guy that lost the most money, but with Yashin's buyout, that's the pre-lockout mistake that effects the team the longest.


How's Alfy lost more than Jagr and Fedorov?
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
saskhab
'03-'04 Goalie Profiles Coming Soon!


Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 3417
Location: Saskatoon!

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bosc Ulrich II wrote:
saskhab wrote:

I'm doing a curious check of salaries around the NHL right now, finding out who is still getting paid 24% less because they have a pre-lockout contract. There won't be many left after this year... Alfredsson, however, is the guy that lost the most money, but with Yashin's buyout, that's the pre-lockout mistake that effects the team the longest.


How's Alfy lost more than Jagr and Fedorov?

His contract length is ridiculous. I'm not sure when he signed the deal, but his option years take him until 2011-12. Not sure if it's the most money, but it's definitely for the longest period of time.

And yes... it is only 5 players next year that still have 24% discounts: Marchant, Madden, Brylin, Alfredsson, and if his option kicks in (which apparently it won't, because it's performance based) Jagr. So likely only 4. A lot of pre-lockout contracts expire on July 1.
_________________
"Oh my God. There she is. Lovely Sally Slater. I should speak to her. But what the hell can I say? Anything that doesn't mention that I masturbate over her memory is probably a good idea."

- Mark Corrigan, Peep Show
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Bosc Ulrich II
OTP Resident Historian


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 3222
Location: Sweetest lid in the league

PostPosted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

saskhab wrote:
Bosc Ulrich II wrote:
saskhab wrote:

I'm doing a curious check of salaries around the NHL right now, finding out who is still getting paid 24% less because they have a pre-lockout contract. There won't be many left after this year... Alfredsson, however, is the guy that lost the most money, but with Yashin's buyout, that's the pre-lockout mistake that effects the team the longest.


How's Alfy lost more than Jagr and Fedorov?

His contract length is ridiculous. I'm not sure when he signed the deal, but his option years take him until 2011-12. Not sure if it's the most money, but it's definitely for the longest period of time.

And yes... it is only 5 players next year that still have 24% discounts: Marchant, Madden, Brylin, Alfredsson, and if his option kicks in (which apparently it won't, because it's performance based) Jagr. So likely only 4. A lot of pre-lockout contracts expire on July 1.


He signed after 03-04, he signed for 5 years + 3 option years. So yeah with the option years maybe he stands to lose more dollars than Jagr and Fedorov.

$3.8 cash and $4.4 hit? I think Ottawa takes that Laughing
_________________
Bring back the old OTP!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
freakydave
Less freaky once you get to know him


Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 164
Location: Rollin down the street

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jyrki21 wrote:
Everyone seems to want him to move on, but there aren't a ton of Plan B's out there.

I also don't think the captaincy really matters, so I somewhat roll my eyes at those who say "re-sign only if he relinquishes the captaincy!"
I agree--have a good look at what's available on the ufa mkt & then realize that there are more buyers in July than there are at the deadline.Filling in the spots of departing ufa's with ufa's & adding missing peices at the same time is an expensive & difficult task.Naslund is the 3rd highest scoring fwd on the team with the addition of a 2nd line centre or big winger Naslund at a reduced price is better option than alot of ufa's out there.
_________________
Mark my words Nonis is a mediocre GM-
I called for his head 07/08
fired apr 14th/08
AV has escaped the axe for now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
King Ryan



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At the right price, I don't see any reason why the Canucks should not bring him back to be a second-liner. As long as you're not relying on him for much -- and I don't see why anyone would be at this point -- I think Naslund is still a useful player.

The mentality that he should be dumped because he's not the player he once was is a strange one to me. We can accept Linden at a much lesser role, why not Naslund?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cannots Luvah
Mike Weaver jersey on order


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 952

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hey welcome aboard KIng Ryan!!! make yourself at home and have fun posting!

if you're wondering where the Game Day Threads are , we do road game threads in the road city's forum so for tonight's game the GDT is in the Phoenix forum.

Welcome!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jyrki21
Rebel Sell + Moneyball = Life


Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1856
Location: Ottawa, ON

PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

King Ryan wrote:
At the right price, I don't see any reason why the Canucks should not bring him back to be a second-liner. As long as you're not relying on him for much -- and I don't see why anyone would be at this point -- I think Naslund is still a useful player.

The mentality that he should be dumped because he's not the player he once was is a strange one to me. We can accept Linden at a much lesser role, why not Naslund?

Oh, thaaaaat's what you meant when you said you might be joining me shortly... I thought you had a ticket booked for Ottawa and one of those John Malkovich non-metal guns in a briefcase.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Offthepost (Generation II) Forum Index -> Vancouver Canucks Forum All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum